Friday, October 28, 2016
Posted by Olive Oyl at 1:13:00 AM
Thursday, October 27, 2016
Oregon standoff verdicts: not guilty
A federal jury on Thursday found Ammon Bundy, his brother Ryan Bundy and five co-defendants not guilty of conspiring to prevent federal employees from doing their jobs through intimidation, threat or force during the 41-day occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.
The Bundy brothers and occupiers Jeff Banta and David Fry also were found not guilty of having guns in a federal facility. Kenneth Medenbach was found not guilty of stealing government property, and a hung jury was declared on Ryan Bundy's charge of theft of FBI surveillance cameras.
"Stunning,'' said defense lawyer Lisa Ludwig, who was standby counsel for Ryan Bundy.
"I'm just thrilled,'' said Neil Wampler's attorney Lisa Maxfield.
The jury of nine women and three men returned the verdicts after five hours of deliberations on Thursday in the high-profile case that riveted the state and drew national and international attention to the federal bird sanctuary in rural eastern Oregon.
The coda to the stunning verdict, undoubtedly a significant blow to federal prosecutors, was when Ammon Bundy's lawyer Marcus Mumford argued that his client, dressed in a gray suit and white dress shirt, should be allowed to walk out of the court, a free man.
U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown told him that there was a U.S. Marshal's hold on him from a pending federal indictment in Nevada.
"If there's a detainer, show me,'' Mumford stood, arguing before U.S. District Judge Anna J. Brown.
Suddenly, a group of about six U.S. Marshals surrounded Mumford at his defense table and grabbed on to him.
"What are you doing?'' Mumford yelled, as he struggled and was taken down to the floor.
As deputy marshals yelled, "Stop resisting,'' the judge demanded, "Everybody out of the courtroom now!''
Mumford was taken into custody, a member of his legal team confirmed.
Ammon Bundy's lawyer J. Morgan Philpot, said afterwards on the courthouse steps that Mumford had been arrested and a taser had been used on him. That could not be independently confirmed.
Just after the verdicts were announced, a few people came through the courthouse doors onto the steps in front of the courthouse to tell a crowd of media and onlookers.
Supporters of the defendants gathered in a joyous hug. One of them, Brand Thornton of Las Vegas, said he had been one of the original occupiers and that he has been at the trial since Oct. 2.
The verdict "means everything," Thornton said. It's huge for ranchers and land rights within Harney County and across the West, he said.
"We did something peaceful and wanted to stay peaceful," said Thornton, who described himself as a close friend of the defendants and stressed that peaceful protest at the occupation was hammered into everyone's from Day 1.
"This is for the people of Oregon," Thornton said. "This was never for us."
Wampler appeared on the courthouse steps and described the verdict as a "stunning victory for rural America."
The five-week trial offered a rare display: Three of the seven defendants chose to represent themselves. Five of them were among the more than 80 people who took the witness stand to testify.
And one of the original 12 jurors was dismissed after a fellow juror raised concerns about his impartiality four days into an initial round of deliberations - what the judge called an "extraordinary circumstance.'' An alternate juror was summoned to begin a new round of deliberations with the remaining 11 jurors Thursday morning.
There was heightened security in and around the courthouse throughout the trial, with security officers ordered to wear bulletproof vests, and metal detectors set up outside the main trial courtroom and an overflow room with a live video feed of the proceedings.
Often, supporters knelt in prayer in the courthouse corridor before the trial began in the mornings, and some kept vigil across the street, with one fellow occupier blowing a ram's horn, or shofar, as the jury deliberated.
Updates to come.
Below is the story of what was also really behind the Bundy/Hammond Ranch and Malheur Wildlife Refuge standoffs, as well as that presently occurring at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation: corporatized colonial resource confiscation, enabled by our massively corrupted federal and state corporate governments.
These men, who were about to be so heavily sentenced here as political prisoners by the US government in Portland, Oregon, were actually attempting – albeit in this instance ill-advisedly -- to protect the rights of the American people, including the many environmentalists who have been so quick to condemn them.
Again, please see the article below with documented forensic evidence from The New York Times, Wikileaks and federal government documents directly relevant to the 2016 presidential campaign. The globalist controllers are now coming after all of us and all that we value, no matter what the color our skin. The only color that such greed can value is green – and of a shade that is never found in nature. The only thing that can counter this is we the people of this planet mindfully standing together to stop it – not being manipulated into self-destructive conflict and condemnation among ourselves. -- REC
Ammon Bundy, other militants found not guilty in Oregon standoff trialAmmon and Ryan Bundy have been found not guilty of conspiracy. Their five co-defendants Jeff Banta, Shawna Cox, David Fry, Kenneth Medenbach and Neil Wampler have all been found not guilty as well.
Jurors were unable to reach a verdict on Ryan Bundy’s theft of government property charge.
The jury returned its verdict after some six weeks of testimony followed by less than six hours deliberations, and the last minute replacement of a juror after an allegation surfaced that he was biased.
The jury was instructed to disregard their previous work and to re-consider the evidence
The charges stem from the 41-day armed occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge near Burns in eastern Oregon’s high desert. The armed protest began Jan. 2 and ended when the final four occupiers surrendered to the FBI on Feb. 11.
Prosecutors initially charged Ammon Bundy, his brother Ryan Bundy, and 24 others with conspiracy to prevent Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Fish and Wildlife employees from doing their jobs at the wildlife refuge in Harney County. Some defendants named in the indictment faced weapons charges for carrying firearms in a federal facility, as well as theft of government property.
Only seven defendants went to trial in September. Others have pleaded guilty or are scheduled to go to trial in February 2017.
Through the government’s case, prosecutors attempted to show the jury evidence about when the alleged conspiracy began, as well as how the occupation unfolded and ultimately ended.
The government relied heavily on testimony from law enforcement, including Harney County Sheriff David Ward, as well as dozens of FBI agents who responded to the occupation or processed evidence at the Malheur refuge after the occupation ended.
“At the end of the day, there is an element of common sense that demonstrates the guilt of these defendants,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Ethan Knight said during his closing arguments during the trial. “These defendants took over a wildlife refuge and it wasn’t theirs.”
Conversely, the defense sought to make its case about a political protest – one about protesting the federal government’s ownership and management of public lands.
“The people have to insist that the government is not our master; they are our servants,” Ryan Bundy said during his closing statement to the jury.
Bundy added the occupation had “nothing to do with impeding and preventing the employees of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.”
The occupation in rural eastern Oregon fueled a long running debate about the role of the federal government when it comes of managing public lands, especially for ranching and other natural resource-based professions.
Throughout the armed protest, occupation leader Ammon Bundy frequently said their goal was to shift the federally-owned land to local control. During presses conferences and interviews, Bundy frequently said he wanted to “get the ranchers back to ranching, get the loggers back to logging and miners back to mining.”
While federal prosecutors worked to keep their case focused on conspiracy, the trial quickly came to symbolize the growing divide between urban and rural America.
“How did any of these people benefit from protesting the death of rural America?” Attorney Matt Schindler, hybrid counsel for defendant Ken Medenbach, said during his closing statements to the jury.
Five of the seven defendants took the stand in their own defense during the trial. Occupation leader Ammon Bundy’s testimony stretched over the course of three days and included stories about growing up on a ranch and his family role in the 2014 armed standoff in Bunkerville, Nevada.
With the first Oregon trial concluded, the Bundy brothers and several other defendants who participated in the Malheur occupation will now travel to Nevada, where they face charges for their roles in the Bunkerville standoff.
Posted by Freewill at 11:34:00 PM
By Anna Von Reitz
I have been asked multiple times
recently for a "Quick Guide" to bring people up to speed on all this history, and I always feel overwhelmed. I have, in large respect, already provided a "Quick Guide" in the form of a large print cartoon illustrated book, "You Know Something Is Wrong When.....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause" available on Amazon.com for around $20 or as an ebook for around $5.
God knows, I have done my best to get the information out there and get the American people up on their feet and moving.
But I understand, too, the desire for a Five Minute, 25 Words or Less Cheat Sheet--- a sort of Cliff Notes version people can very quickly grasp. I am not sure it can be done, and if it can, it must rest on very limited supporting citations--- in other words, you pretty much have to accept what I am telling you because there isn't time or room in such a document to bring in any reams of proof.
That said, here's my best shot at it this morning:
1. At the end of the Revolution there were two populations of people left on this continent---- "the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States" and the "Inhabitants"----- British Subjects known as "citizens" here to provide "essential government services". The evidence for this is in The Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783 and in Article IV of the original Constitution called The Constitution for the united States of America.
2. There are still two populations on this continent--- the American State Nationals who are the present-day "free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States" and two brands of present-day "inhabitants"---- "United States Citizens" occupying the District of Columbia and "citizens of the United States" occupying the Washington DC Municipality.
3. The actual states of the Union are all Republics. The government of the District of Columbia is a democracy. The municipal government of Washington DC is an oligarchy. All these populaces co-habit the same space and freely roam about this country, but they all function under different rules and occupy different jurisdictions and are subject to different forms of law.
4. The "United States Citizens" (British Subjects) and the "Municipal citizens" (Corporate Slaves) are here to serve ----both to provide essential government services under contract to our state republics and also to serve their own separate foreign "federal" and "municipal" governments.
5. The American State Nationals inhabiting the Republics are the "free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States" who are owed "essential government services" from these other governments as our employees---and we are all born into that political status as Americans---but soon after birth, and without any full disclosure to our Mothers, we are entrapped by legal chicanery and "presumed to be citizens" and "wards of the state" and members of these other populations instead.
6. This undisclosed process which is a direct violation of Section 11 of the 1933 Securities Act results in a form of political genocide known as mischaracterization of non-combatants and it is a war crime carrying the death penalty.
7. This international war crime has been carried out against the unsuspecting American people by their own employees in gross Breach of Trust and violation of both the letter and the spirit of The Constitution for the united States of America--- the actual and only original equity contract that all American states and American State Nationals are owed.
8. Who is ultimately responsible for this outrageous circumstance? In direct terms--- Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Sir Winston Churchill. In more abstract terms, the members of the United States Congress and the British Government.
9. Finally, though we have been the victims of this crime and have unknowingly allowed our own employees to entrap us and make false claims against us and our property rights, we bear some responsibility ourselves, for failure to knowledgeably assert our own political identity and clarify our separate political status in the pubic records.
10. Our birth events should have been recorded as part of the land records of our lawful organic state republics and instead were only registered in the foreign and international jurisdiction of the sea. We trusted our employees to do their jobs, not work calamity against us while on our payroll. The British Crown, a foreign commercial corporation seized upon our Given Names and copyrighted them and claimed to act as our usufruct---- using our good names for its benefit, so long as it did not harm us in the process.
11. Purposeful self-interested non-disclosure of any contractual arrangement is fraud and fraud vitiates all "laws" and contracts---including any merely presumed political status. Fraud has no statute of limitations.
12. The testimony of six generations of Americans impacted by British Breach of Trust (ever since the Civil War and only more terribly and recently since the Second World War) carried out by British Subjects operating as United States Citizens on our soil is eloquent and the nearly disastrous results of it are plain to see--- corruption of our government and its institutions, pillaging and plundering of American property, enslavement of the American people, false commercial claims, illegal foreclosures, counterfeiting of our credit, non-consensual hypothecation of debt against our assets. The ravages of equally foreign "citizens of the United States" upon our economy and well-being are also self-evident in the burgeoning welfare rolls, crime statistics, unemployment, frustration and anger and suffering of our people.
12. Your remedy? Know who you are -- a living, breathing, age of majority, non-citizen American State National -- objecting to and rebutting any presumption otherwise, owing no allegiance other than your natural allegiance to the soil of your organic state of the Union. Place record of your self-declaration of political status firmly on the public record by having it witnessed and notarized and recorded by the land recorder's office. Every single one of them has a "miscellaneous file".
13. Second, bring your claim and redeem your estate. Go to the State Secretary of State's Office in the state where you were born and tell them who you are and that you are here to redeem your estate. Watch the worms turn and the cockroaches scatter.
Posted by Freewill at 11:16:00 PM
By Anna Von Reitz
A very intelligent question was asked by Elvia who wanted to know what the complaint against Judge Doucette was about.
Essentially, those complaining thought that The Constitution prohibits the Judicial Branch from making appointments---- which it does, so they objected to Judge Doucette appointing new Federal Continental Marshals.
What the Complainers didn't grasp and probably still don't, is that Judge Doucette isn't operating as part of the Federal Government, even though he is acting in international jurisdiction. Instead, he is exercising the reserved international jurisdiction of the states and the people per Article X of The Constitution.
Under The Constitution the Executive Branch of the Federal Government makes appointments, not members of the Judicial Branch---- but we are not part of the Federal Government, and not part of its Judicial or Executive Branches, and we are not attempting to exercise any of the powers delegated to the Federal Government, either.
Under the reserved powers of the states and people (Article X) when operating as Federal (Continental) Judges we can also appoint Federal (Continental) Marshals as officers serving the Federal Postal District Court which is part of our "reserved" international jurisdiction as opposed to the "United States District Court" which holds the delegated international jurisdiction granted to the Federal Government---subject to The Constitution.
Postal District = international land jurisdiction.
"US District" = international sea jurisdiction.
Judge Doucette is operating as a Colorado State Judge under American Common Law and as such has the right to swear in both elected Sheriffs and men appointed as Deputies by the Sheriff---who are Officers of the Common Law Court.
These men are called "peace officers" not "law enforcement officers".
Peace officers enforce the Organic and Public Law of the nation-states, including The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation (1781), The Constitution for the united States of America, Northwest Ordinance, and United States Statutes at Large, as well as State Session Laws.
Law enforcement officers enforce Codes, Statutes, and Regulations, which are supposed to apply only to corporations and employees and dependents of the Federal Government and "federated" State of States.
Federal "citizens" called "United States Citizens" and "citizens of the United States" are all British Subjects and they are all considered to "reside" in our actual land-based states on a temporary basis for the purpose to providing us with an agreed upon roster of "governmental services" as indicated in Article IV of The Constitution.
So there are profound differences between peacekeepers and law enforcement officers, and there are equally profound differences between Justices ---the proper title for Common Law "judges" operating under the American Common Law-- and Admiralty or Administrative Court Judges operating under the Law of the Sea.
In addition to his duties as a Colorado State Superior Court Judge, Judge Doucette also functions as a Federal Postal District Court Judge under Article X, exercising the Reserved Rights of the people and Colorado State in international jurisdiction.
This is a little bit harder for people to grasp, but still simple enough when you think about it.
The Constitution agreement between the states and the new "Federal Government" delegated a portion of the state's powers and responsibilities to the federal entity created, defined, tasked, and limited by The Constitution. These included nineteen enumerated duties expressed as "powers" which the Federal Government was obligated to provide as services to the subscribing states.
Always remember that The Constitution is a service contract, just like a service contract you might have with a company to mow your lawn, rake your leaves, clean your gutters and do certain other enumerated tasks.
All nineteen of these services/duties assigned to the Federal Government are in international jurisdiction and under the international Law of the Sea.
So, in effect, the states gave away a portion of their international jurisdiction to the Federal Government to administer, but the rest of their international jurisdiction they reserved for the states and the people---- the international jurisdiction of the sea was thus split between the states and the people on one side and the federal government on the other.
Under Article X the Colorado State and the people retain control of the Federal Postal Districts and the Federal Postal District Courts. The Article X Judges, including Judge Bruce Doucette, may swear in Federal (Continental) Marshals to serve as Peace Officers in the same way that a Sheriff swears in Deputies.
And just as with the distinction between actual Sheriffs on the Land who are peace officers versus "Sheriffs" on the Sea who are law enforcement officers, Federal (Continental) Marshals are peace officers concerned with enforcement of The Constitution and protection of the people and delivery of the services guaranteed to the states, while United States Marshals are law enforcement officers tasked to ride herd on United States Citizens and "citizens of the United States" and with the enforcement of codes, statutes, and regulations.
Thus at the international level in this country we have two court systems---Federal Postal District Courts and United States District Courts------ one Court to exercise the undelegated portion of international jurisdiction owed to the people and the state, another Court to exercise the delegated portion of international jurisdiction that is the responsibility of the Federal Government and the appointment practices of one do not apply to the other.
Posted by Freewill at 11:14:00 PM
By Anna Von Reitz
For the last several days I have been getting stupid comments from wannabe patriots who are, as usual, completely misunderstanding the Law and The Constitution, both in function and in jurisdiction----but who are nonetheless trying to use both as a means to tear down the valid efforts of their more informed countrymen to restore the Public and Organic Law of this country and enforce the provisions of The Constitution we are owed and rebuild the American Common Law Court System which we owe ourselves.
American Common Law modeled on British Common Law flourished in this country from the time the first pilgrims stumbled ashore to the 1960's. Some of us are old enough to remember its fading glory, before it was swept under the rug by corporate interlopers abusing maritime and administrative courts to pillage the American People.
Central to the issue is simply this---- are you a "citizen" meaning a British Subject here to provide our states with governmental services per Article IV of the Constitution, or are you a "national" meaning one of the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States?
In other words, do you choose to function as a "person"---- a corporate entity---- or as one of the "people"---a living and breathing being?
Depending on your answer, you are bound by The Constitution or protected by it.
You either exist to serve the government, or the government exists to serve you.
It is one or the other---- government slaves or free people, and you get to choose, so long as you have knowledge enough to make the choice and live accordingly.
A group of "Don't Know Who We Are, But We Think We Are Going Somewhere" patriots have the mistaken idea that we are all "citizens" and that we are parties to The Constitution and that we are bound to the limitations and prohibitions of The Constitution.
If we are acting as British Subjects we are indeed bound by The Constitution while living on American soil, but if we are American Nationals, we are not parties to The Constitution and not defined, limited, or bound by it.
The Constitution is not the source of any of our rights and material interests. It exists to create and define and limit the activities of the "Federal Government" and that includes Federal employees and dependents, African Americans, and political asylum seekers.
It's only function with regard to the People of this country is to protect them and their National Trust, which includes the rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights, and the right to Common Law provided for in Amendment VII, and the exemptions established by Article IV.
So here comes Mr Goodman and Hartford Van Dyke, both good enough men and well-intentioned, but fundamentally ignorant of some very important and basic information.
They want to object to the restoration of the American Common Law Court System and they want to object to the induction and instruction of Federal Continental Marshals, because they say that this is not part of The Constitution. Why would it be?
The power to appoint Federal Continental (Land Jurisdiction) Marshals falls under Article X of The Constitution---- rights reserved in international jurisdiction to the states and the people of the states.
And by states, we mean the actual geographic states.
Likewise, the right of the people to assemble their own Jural Assemblies, and elect their own sheriffs, judges, and other court officers, to create and enforce the organic and public law of this country is not covered by The Constitution. It far pre-dates The Constitution and functions totally outside and without regard to The Constitution, which applies only to the Federal Government and Federal Citizens.
People who think that The Constitution is the "be all and end all" are missing by far the greater portion of the Public Law and don't have a clue as to the proper functioning of our government. In fact, they mistake themselves as British Subject "Citizens" of one stripe or another, and attempt to curtail the activities and abrogate the rights of others according to their own ignorant and limited vision.
The recent attacks against Judge Bruce Doucette are emblematic of this idiocy.
The free people of Colorado have the guaranteed right to elect him as their judge and all the British Subjects functioning as "US Citizens" and living under the limitations of The Constitution don't have the right to say "Boo!" about it.
Picture it as two groups --- one Irish, living under Irish law, and one Spanish, living under Spanish law--- in the same community.
What happens when the Spanish mistake an Irishman for one of theirs? Does he become subject to Spanish law? Of course, not.
And the same thing happens when a British Subject Citizen who lives as a "person" under the prohibitions of The Constitution mistakes Judge Bruce Doucette, one of the people of Colorado, as one of theirs and attempts to complain about him as if he was their judge.
The plain and simple fact is that Bruce is one of the people, not a "person" and he has been elected to serve as a Judge by others living in Colorado, who have also elected to live as people, not persons.
He is in a completely separate jurisdiction and is owed complete immunity from attacks, presumptions, or demands based on any "Constitution" whatsoever.
I will say it again:
British Subjects called "citizens" and "residents" who are here to provide governmental services per Article IV are bound by The Constitution, which creates, defines and limits their activities on American soil.
American State Nationals are instead protected by The Constitution and are not bound by it. We recognize and enforce the limits of The Constitution, but to us, it is simply an agreement our states made a long time ago to receive certain stipulated governmental services and which set the rules and parameters within which those services are provided. We are not even parties to The Constitution. Our states are.
So long as we elect to function as people instead of persons, we are not bound by any "Separation of Powers" or other limit established by The Constitution.
We are not obligated to live as subjects of any government. We are not citizens of any kind or stripe. We can locally elect among ourselves anyone we like to serve as our Justices and Judges, our sheriffs and our clerks and bailiffs and so on and nobody who wishes to continue to live as a British Subject under The Constitution has any right or reason to object or say one word to us about it.
It's our business. Not yours.
Judge Bruce Doucette isn't your judge and isn't pretending to be. He is the freely elected Judge of the people of Colorado---not the "persons" of Colorado---- and if you are still ranting about The Constitution and calling yourself a "citizen", you aren't one of the people----you are operating as a British Subject, a foreigner, with no right to complain and no right to object and no right to interfere in the operations of the American Government.
In fact, you would do jolly well-enough to pay attention to the mammoth mis-administration and criminality of your own government---- the Federal Government and its "State of State" franchises--- which are on the verge of collapse and international indictment as a result of their numerous crimes against the American people they are bound to serve and the many other nations which have suffered from their unique combination of guile and self-interest.
And so much for the "interpretations" of Mr. Goodman and Hartford Van Dyke and the 90 British Subjects bringing their complaints against the American Judge Bruce Doucette.
Posted by Freewill at 11:11:00 PM
By Anna Von Reitz
Ever wonder how things vanish? Massive things? Entire civilizations, not to mention vast business empires that just go "Pop!" ---- now you see 'em, now you don't?
The Ten Tribes of Israel? Well, they didn't really vanish. They were "spiritually lost" and succumbed to the charms of Babylonian idolatry. We actually know where they went and we know where their descendants are to this day.
In the 1300's the vast Knights Templar organization folded and disappeared overnight taking the bulk of their wealth with them. A few leaders were captured and tortured and killed, most notably, Jacques de Molay, but as for the gold and thousands of others, they simply disappeared.
We know that they went to Scotland and the Isle of Mann and Malta and the Hebrides and Iceland and Norway and Russia and back to their home bases in the Middle East and Africa----and that they not only embellished the Inner City of London long after the purge of the Pope and the French King---- they continued to be Lords of the Admiralty and the Exchequer. They were on the boats to the New World along with the most ardent Spanish treasure seekers and their members swelled the ranks of the Jesuit Order.
Did they vanish, really, or have they always been hidden in plain view?
And then, there was the mammoth Dutch East India Trading Company, four or five times larger than its nearest competitor, the British East India Company---easily the most successful, most predatory, and richest commercial company on Earth, and yet, it vanished overnight. Poof!
And except for Frank O'Collins and a few other Intrepid Explorers into the realms of Utter Darkness, we would probably remain ignorant of the deals the Dutch East India Traders made with the British which allowed them to come here, to America, and act as predators let loose on our shores.
Then as now, the Dutch East India Company specialized in dealing in slaves, drugs, prostitution, money laundering, war profiteering, and every other nasty, unspeakable vice. If nothing else, we can follow their progress in the New World by the proliferation of their wares.
And now, the parasites that began their journey in Babylon 8,000 years ago and who have wandered the Earth like their Father, Cain, generation to generation, are moving on again. They have turned their faces to the sun and yet continue to see and read everything in reverse.
As crazy and unlikely as it seems, a good portion of all the ill-gotten wealth acquired from centuries of war, pillaging, and plundering, is moving to China. When the commentators woke up last week and realized that the perpetrators of all this fraud have vanished the rumors flew wildly around the globe and pole to pole.
Had they all shipped out "off world" to travel to other dimensions and galaxies?
Had they headed for underground bunkers and prepared for the worst?
It's much more prosaic than that. They all just up-ended and relocated to China, like tapeworms journeying on, host to host, they will subtly eat away the substance of China and the Chinese People and this, despite our best attempts to warn them all.
The Forbidden Fruit, the Great Lie, is hard to beat.
One wonders what will happen when the world wakes up and realizes that they are gone from our shores, and gone from Europe, too. What will people make of yet another "Vanishing" and what sorts of tricks will they pull from their kit-bags upon landing in Beijing?
Will they take to silk? Learn to drink tea----again---after 300 years in New York?
And what about the rest of us? Have we finally grown up enough to recognize their attempts to pit Russia and America against each other and provoke a war between their own two natural enemies?
Make no mistake--- the predatory parasites would like nothing better than to cook something up and stand back and watch us kill each other. Why? Because they are Monarchists and they always have been.
It is far easier to control a single Monarch than bamboozle 390 million separate sovereigns.
They realized early on that the American Republic and American workers actually had more in common with the Russian workers and the ideals of Russian Communism than they did with old crumbly European Monarchies----- so almost from the first, it has been the modus operandi of the Divine Right proponents to spread suspicion, fear and hatred of Russians among the Americans and suspicion and fear and hatred of Americans among the Russians.
Keeping us at each other's throats has been very convenient. It kept both young, powerful, idealistic nations busy and prevented us from noticing all that they were quietly doing to us behind our backs to benefit themselves at our mutual expense......and even now, when they have quietly vanished, simply disappeared to their new royal palaces and set up their stock and trade behind a seawall composed of billions of Chinese bodies, they continue to prod us and hope that we will be stupid enough to oblige their sincere wish for our mutual destruction.
Sooner or later, we all have to quit being the straight men in these evil, self-interested games. Sooner or later, we have to stop doing what we are told----especially when we are being prodded into war.
Posted by Freewill at 11:09:00 PM
Sing a little louder
Sing a little louder
Talks about the new documentary
Posted by Olive Oyl at 10:11:00 PM
Jesuit conspiracy theories
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
These people (lizards) are the scum of the earth.... (Jesuit) of theRoman Catholic Church and the Vatican.
HistoryThe earliest recorded Jesuit conspiracy theories are found in the Monita secreta, an early 17th-century document that alleged that the Jesuits were trying to gain wealth in illicit ways.
The Protestant Reformation, and especially the English Reformation, brought new suspicions against the Jesuits, who were accused of infiltrating political realms and non-Catholic churches. In England, it was forbidden to belong to the Jesuits, under grave penalties, including the death penalty. A 1689 work, Foxes and Firebrands by Robert Ware (later exposed as a forger), claimed Jesuits took a secret oath that stated
I do further promise and declare that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly and openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Masons, as I am directed to do, to extirpate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex nor condition, and that will hang, burn, waste, boil, flay, strangle, and bury alive these infamous heretics; rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women, and crush their infants' heads against the walls in order to annihilate their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly I will secretly use the poisonous cup, the strangulation cord, the steel of the poniard, or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honour, rank, dignity or authority of the persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agents of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Father of the Society of Jesus. In confirmation of which I hereby dedicate my life, soul, and all corporal powers, and with the dagger which I now receive I will subscribe my name written in my blood in testimony thereof; and should I prove false, or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the militia of the Pope cut off my hands and feet and my throat from ear to ear, my belly be opened and sulphur burned therein with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth, and my soul shall be tortured by demons in eternal hell forever.Jesuitism is the term their opponents coined for the practices of the Jesuits in the service of the Counter-Reformation.
Other conspiracy theories and criticisms relate to the role of the Jesuits in the colonization of the New World, and to their involvement with indigenous peoples, alleging that the Jesuits, through their settlements (reductions), may willingly have contributed to the assimilation of indigenous nations.[clarification needed]
TRUMP IS A JESUIT AND IS WORKING FOR THE CLINTONS..... HE SOUNDS GREAT, BUT HILLARY (THE CLOWN/CLONE) NEEDS TO GET INSTALLED FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO TAKE TOTALLY OVER...
SEE: NEXT ARTICLES....
PLEASE WAKE UP AMERICA....OUR LEADERS ARE ASLEEP....
READ MORE HERE.....
Posted by Popeye at 7:55:00 PM
A stunning Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today reveals that the Security Council (SC), this morning, authorized the sending to the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) of an emergency communiqué requesting an immediate explanation as to why Hillary Clinton’s money laundering organization, known as the Clinton Foundation, this past week purchased over $137 million of illegal arms and ammunition—and whose destination is to be the United States with delivery being marked as “mid-November 2016”.
According to this report, SVR analysts began expressing “urgent concern” earlier this year when the main “elements/factions” of the feared Viktor Bout’s international arms smuggling crime organization began arriving in the Republic of Albania—that is the only Muslim nation in Europe.
Viktor Bout is most popularly known in the West as the “Lord of War” for his workings with the CIA to smuggle illegal weapons throughout the world to further the maniacal interests of the United States—until 2011 when then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had him jailed.
Though a citizen of the Federation, the SVR had no “complaint/concern” with Hillary Clinton having Bout jailed for 25 years as it was an internal matter of the CIA—but whose intelligence analysts expressed “worry/confusion” this past May (2016) when US Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin said he should have had a reduced sentence—and that led yesterday to Bout “suddenly/magically” being transferred out of maximum security to the “country club atmosphere” of the general ward of the US Federal Prison he’s been confined to.
Coinciding with Bout’s “mysterious/magical” prison transfer yesterday was Hillary Clinton’s money laundering Clinton Foundation transferring $137.7 million to the Socialist Party of Albania (SPA) controlled by that nations Prime Minister Edi Rama—who is not only the head of the Xhakja Clan (known in the West as the Albanian Mafia) but who was also, and shockingly, put into power by the Obama-Clinton regime over the protests of the Albanian people who did not want a “mafia government” controlling them.
With Hillary Clinton’s international arms merchant Prime Minister Rama having turned the entire Balkan region into one of the world’s largest areas for arms smuggling that now threatens its very security, she has been aided in this effort by what many are calling her “puppet master”—the Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros that recently released, and shocking, secret emails show him ordering Hillary Clinton to install this mafia criminal as the leader of Albania.
To fully understand why Hillary Clinton made this massive arms purchase, and no doubt was aided in doing so by the CIA’s arms smuggler Viktor Bout is her adherence to George Soros’s radical vision of open borders—and that he single handedly began implementing by creating the European refugee crisis that will, likewise, engulf the United States should Hillary Clinton become president and as exactly as her secret emails reveals she plans on doing.
Also, as the Federation knows all too well, the Soros-Clinton “master plan” to take down a nation begins with the establishment of what are called Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) to act as a “shadow government” ready to take power once the established order is thrown into chaos by massive protests—and why, in 2013, President Putin banned them from operating in Russia.
(WHY HAVEN'T SOROS AND CLINTON BEEN ARRESTED IN THE UNITED STATES AND TRIED FOR TREASON?)
Once these weapons are in the hands of Hillary Clinton’s “new revolutionaries”, they will then be used to unleash a “terror wave” across America protesting Donald Trump’s landslide victory—thus enabling President Obama to declare martial law to disarm all of these people, and once doing so, allow the US Electors to place Hillary Clinton in power. [Note: American presidents are NOT elected by the voting of citizens, but by the vote of the Electors selected from each of that nations 50 States.]
This report sadly concludes by noting that the massive vote fraud already being committed by Hillary Clinton’s “new revolutionaries” throughout the United States, and that led this past week to former US Congressman Joe Walsh stunningly stating “If Trump loses, I'm grabbing my musket”—a reference to one of the darkest times in American history when that nation’s ordinary citizens banded together to fight the British Empire for their freedom—should strike fear into all Americans of what Hillary Clinton’s “new revolutionaries” are doing right now—and if not, nothing will.
Hillary Clinton sold her sold to the devil many years ago
October 27, 2016
AMERICANS: YOUR 'VOTE' MEANS NOTHING AT THE POLLS - THE POLLS ARE ALL RIGGED AND PROOF OF THIS IS ALREADY BEING DEMONSTRATED AT AND BY THE REPORTING PRECINCTS - SOROS RIGGED SOFTWARE IS CHANGING ALL VOTES TO CLINTON
IT ALSO APPEARS THERE ARE NO PATRIOT LEADERS FOR OUR NATION AND THAT THE 'REPUBLIC' IS A TOTAL RUSE - A CONTINUATION OF THE CRIME SYNDICATE MANY OF US WERE HOPING TO FINALLY RID THIS NATION OF
THE ENTIRE WORLD LOOKS UPON THIS NATION IN WONDER AND AMAZEMENT - HOW COULD THE AMERICANS SIT BACK AND ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN?
GOOD QUESTION - CONSIDER THIS
IT ALL STARTED WHEN WE DID NOTHING WHEN THE BIBLE WAS REMOVED FROM OUR SCHOOLS, AND A PRAYER AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH SCHOOL DAY WAS STOPPED
AND PRAYERS AND SINGING THE NATIONAL ANTHEM AT OUR SPORTS EVENTS WAS STOPPED BECAUSE SOMEONE WAS 'OFFENDED'
AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS WERE REMOVED FROM THE SCHOOLS AND OFFICE WALLS BECAUSE IT 'OFFENDED' SOMEONE
THERE IS MORE, OF COURSE - BUT WHERE WERE THE AMERICANS TO PUT A STOP TO THIS NONSENSE - THERE ARE WAY MORE OF US THAN THEM
THE SINKING OF THE TITANIC IS NOTHING COMPARED TO THE SINKING AND TOTAL DROWNING OF A NATION THAT ONCE STOOD FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS AND FREEDOM AND WHICH GAVE GLORY TO AND HONORED, SERVED AND LOVED THE LORD GOD ALMIGHTY
IT NOW IS QUITE EVIDENT THAT THE AMERICAN RIFLE IS THE ONLY 'VOTE' THAT WILL COUNT IN THE COMING DAYS
ARE WE READY FOR THE FIGHT OF OUR VERY LIVES?
MAY THE LORD GOD ALMIGHTY HAVE MERCY ON US
YOU 'FEAR MONGERS' AND 'HATERS OF TRUTH' COMMENTORS - STUFF IT UP YOUR YOU-KNOW-WHAT
YOUR 'COMMENTS' WILL NOT BE POSTED - YOU ARE TOTALLY IGNORANT AND A LARGE PART OF THE REASON FOR THE DEMISE OF OUR ONCE RESPECTED AND LOVED NATION
Posted by Olive Oyl at 6:39:00 PM