THE DICK ACT OF 1909 !! - This is legit and not a joke..

Subject: Fwd: FW: THE DICK ACT OF 1909 !! - This is legit and not a joke..

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joe

Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 12:10 PM
Subject: FW: THE DICK ACT OF 1909 !! - This is legit and not a joke..

> Wonder who in Washington is supposed to keep up with all the
> laws that have been passed (and ignored) throughout the years?
>
> THE BILL was passed back in 1902 and grants full rights to
> anyone who wants to own as many guns as they can afford. Any movement
> to limit guns or magazines will be in direct violation of this law.
> Pass it around.
>
> THE DICK ACT OF 1902! (BY CHARLES WILLIAM FREDERICK DICK) ARE
> YOU AWARE OF THIS LAW?
>
> DICK ACT OF 1902 - CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) -
> PROTECTION AGAINST TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT .
>
> IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THE ADMINISTRATION IS COUNTING ON THE
> FACT THAT THE AMERICAN CITIZENS DON'T KNOW THIS, THEIR RIGHTS AND THE
> CONSTITUTION. DON'T PROVE THEM RIGHT.
>
> THE DICK ACT OF 1902 ALSO KNOWN AS THE EFFICIENCY OF MILITIA
> BILL H.R. 11654 OF JUNE 28, 1902 and INVALIDATES ALL SO-CALLED
> GUN-CONTROL LAWS.
>
> It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
>
> The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized
> militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State,
> Territory and District of Columbia; the unorganized militia; and the
> regular army.
>
> The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the
> ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the
> absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms
> of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.
>
>
>
>
>
> The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate
> bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another
> gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
>
> The President of the United States has zero authority without
> violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside
> of their State borders.
>
> The National Guard Militia can only be required by the
> National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution
> (to uphold the laws of the Union ; to suppress insurrection and repel
> invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General
> Government can call upon the National Guard.
>
> Source...
> http://www.civilrightstaskforce.info/gun_control_forbidden.htm
>
> Get this message out to all your email contacts. It's time to
> learn about your rights.
>
> (Thus making all California ( Colorado & others) gun &
> magazine limiting laws illegal !!!)
>
> I'm not so sure the current administration KNOWS, nor even
> cares, what the laws, Constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of
> Independence say.
>
> But it doesn't matter to them anyway. He and his minions
> certainly don't have any respect for them or us and will continue to
> do whatever they can get away with to further their cause of gaining
> complete control.
>
> Charles William Frederick Dick (November 3, 1858 - March 13,
> 1945) was a Republican politician from Ohio. He served in the United
> States House of Representatives and U.S. Senate.
>
> I was curious as to who was the Dick in the DICK act of 1909
> and found out little about him, but I found out a little more about
> the Dick Act.
>
>
> http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642
>
>
> www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642
>
> Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, "the
> Organized Militia (the National Guard) cannot be employed for
> offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States."
>
> The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on
> Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson
> in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war
> in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought
> to have been impeached.
>
> During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to
> pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the
> ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was
> defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that
> Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to
> empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send
> them out of the country.
>
> The fact is that the President has no constitutional right,
> under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight
> outside the borders of the USA , and not even beyond the borders of
> their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which
> still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution
> which they swore an oath to uphold.
>
> Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a
> speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record,
> House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: "The
> militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is
> distinct from the Army of the United States ." In these pages we also
> find a statement made by Daniel Webster, "that the great principle of
> the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of
> the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia
> of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with
> greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants
> and limits the power of Congress over it."
>
> "This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies
> clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the
> Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army
> to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and
> conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless
> and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose.
> Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and
> if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the
> bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict
> with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same
> section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would
> have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power."
>
> The Honorable William Gordon Congressional Record, House, Page
> 640 -1917.
>
>
>
>
>
> PASS THIS AROUND TO ALL OF AMERICA!!!!