Friday, November 20, 2015

Busted: Totally Proven Beyond All Doubt: The French Government Staged The Attacks




 

BUSTED:  TOTALLY PROVEN BEYOND ALL DOUBT:

 

THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT STAGED THE ATTACKS, ROUNDED UP THE FUTURE "VICTIMS" AFTER THEY LEFT THE BATACLAN, MURDERED THEM WHILE THEY WERE IN CUSTODY, AND THEN SET UP THE BLOODY SCENE WITH THE BODIES.

 

A GLITCH IN THE MEDICAN MEDIA WAS PROVEN THAT THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT MURDERED "VICTIMS" WHILE IN CUSTODY OF THE AUTHORITIES.  WE DEFINITELY HAVE A LOT OF DEAD PEOPLE IN THESE "TERROR ATTACKS," AND IT LOOKS LIKE NONE DIED "IN THE NAME OF ISLAM."

 

BUSTED:  THE ONE MEXICAN GIRL (Nohemi Gonzalez) WHO DIED WAS CONFIRMED ALIVE AFTER THE BATACLAN SHOOTING WHEN HER FAMILY CALLED HER BOYFRIEND'S PHONE AFTER HEARING ABOUT THE SHOOTING IN THE MEXICAN MEDIA.  HE SAID HE WAS WITH HER OUTSIDE AND THEY WERE BOTH FINE AND NOW, AFTER THE AUTHORITIES TOOK HER INTO CUSTODY, SHE IS DEAD.

 

BUSTED BUSTED BUSTED.  THERE WERE NO TERRORISTS.  THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT DID THIS JOB AND IT IS A FILTHY FALSE FLAG. 


I MIGHT GET BLASTED OFF THE WEB FOR REPORTING THIS, BUT IT IS A COLD HARD FACT.  IT CAME ACROSS THE TELEVISION WHILE I WAS GOING OVER THE PHOTOS OF THE BATACLAN. THE DEAD BODY SCENE LOOKED REAL, BUT WAS TOO LOW RES TO WORK WITH.  THEN THIS REPORT CAME ACROSS THE TV WITH THE GIRL'S FAMILY ON TELEVISION, SAYING IT LIKE IT HAPPENED FROM THEIR PERSPECTIVE.  THEY CONFIRMED SHE WAS NOT SHOT AFTER THEY HEARD ABOUT THE SHOOTINGS IN THE PRESS.  THEY GOT AHOLD OF HER BOYFRIEND AFTER THE BATACLAN WAS EMPTY,  WHO WAS WITH HER ALIVE AND TOTALLY UNHURT OUTSIDE THE THEATER.   NOW, AFTER BEING TAKEN INTO CUSTODY BY AUTHORITIES TOTALLY UNHURT,  SHE HAS BEEN CONFIRMED DEAD AND HER FAMILY IS WONDERING HOW,  WHEN THEY CONFIRMED SHE WAS NOT HURT AND ALL WAS WELL.


THEY BLEW IT BLEW IT BLEW IT! THERE WERE NO ARABS!   THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT DID THIS AND GOT THEIR BODY COUNT BY MURDERING PEOPLE IN CUSTODY!

The fact that the French government murdered victims and then planted them back in the scenes afterwards explains completely why no real shooting ever turned up on amateur cell phone video from the Bataclan, yet there was a significant body count. They took this Mexican girl into custody, murdered her, brought her back into the Bataclan and dragged her to where they left her dead. This explains why blood is dragged all over the floor in the bataclan, because they dragged and dropped the bodies after killing them. This might be the first time ever the perpetrators of a false flag got busted by their own media. 

I REPEAT: THE ONE MEXICAN VICTIM WAS CONFIRMED ALIVE AND UNHURT AFTER THE BATACLAN "SHOOTING", ONLY TO END UP BACK INSIDE THE THEATER DEAD FOR THE PHOTO SHOOT. THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT DID THIS.  NO IFS OR BUTS.

Now let's keep an eye on the distribution of deaths to find out if the authorities ID'd people before killing them to get deaths from as many countries as possible. If there are deaths from everywhere, that is exactly what they did. The French checked ID's to decide who they would kill, based upon where they were from, to get as many countries as possible to stand behind a war on Islam after losing one of their own . . . . .

After reporting this, I might as well pop in a movie and wait for a drone strike. And by the way, I am feeling well and not suicidal.

 

Anything to get their world war 3, ANYTHING. 


I am actually pissed off beyond belief.  Of all the gall! They needed a real body count so they murdered people who were PROVEN ALIVE after the "event!"

Ok, after working on this for a while, things are coming into view. Here is what likely happened...........  

 

Agents, not "terrorists," got a small body count at the scene, and then spiced it with people they detained afterwards. That makes the most sense based on various reports.  They did not kill all "in custody."  They spiced it with people they needed dead for the most political gain by murdering people who were selected for their nationality via their ID's while in custody.

 

Among the dead, there is quite a list of countries. So far we have: Michael Jozic, from Belgium ;  Elif Dogam from Turkey ..................


OTHER COUNTRIES NAMED, TO CUT TO THE CHASE: France, Sweden, Tunisia, Mexico, United States, Chile, Algeria, Portugal, Italy, Morocco, Spain, England, Germany, and the list is not done yet.

The Mexican victim's family is questioning how on earth she is dead when she was alive after everything settled down, ALIVE LONG ENOUGH AFTER IT ALL FOR THE MEDIA TO HAVE REPORTED IT, AND FOR THEM TO TRY TO CALL AFTER HEARING ABOUT IT. 

THIS GIRL'S FAMILY WAS IN MEXICO. THIS NEWS DID NOT BREAK IN MEXICO IN FIVE MINUTES. IT TOOK A LOT LONGER THAN THAT. HOW ON EARTH DID THIS GIRL END UP DEAD WHEN SHE WAS FINE WHEN THIS HIT THE NEWS IN MEXICO LONG ENOUGH FOR HER FAMILY TO RESPOND TO THE NEWS OF THE ATTACK AT THE BATACLAN AND CALL?
 
This latest event might be what kills false flags, the French government is BUSTED WHOLESALE.  
 
Nov 13 2015  ONE photo of Bataclan released   HERE IT IS
 
UPDATE:  ALL PHOTO ANOMALIES BELOW ARE FULLY EXPLAINED BY THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT MURDERING THESE PEOPLE AND THEN SETTING UP THE GRISLY BLOODY SCENE.  THIS IS PROVEN.  THEY TOTALLY SCREWED THE POOCH....

   

They released a photo of the bataclan with dead bodies, blood, the whole 9 yards. But there are serious problems with it.

1. No EMT response. If this setup was not wanted by the government, EMT's would be all over it, dragging even known dead bodies to the hospital to be PROVEN DEAD.

2. No police response. If this was a scene that was not set up by the government, police would be ALL OVER IT.

3. Five people standing on the balcony, 1 photographer, and one guy on the ground floor. NOT A SINGLE ONE out with the bodies. 
 

HERE IS A HUGE ONE: CONFIRMED: 

 

4. The original picture in the highest resolution was released as a PNG screen capture. That exact photo is  just above here, totally unmodified. If you wanted to avoid all chances of anyone doing a real photo analysis to dig up evidence, a screen capture of a photo would do that job perfectly because a screen capture has so little to work with.  It consists only of the bits it takes to display an image.  There are no sub bits in a screen capture that can be pulled forward and analyzed. A REAL EVIDENCE PHOTO WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN RELEASED AS A .PNG SCREEN CAPTURE.

 

5. The Bataclan theater has many options for floor and seating arrangements but, in all past photos from before this "shooting", they try to at least maintain the honor of the theater by not having an event done on bare concrete. Why is the concrete in this photo bare? OBVIOUSLY TO AVOID MESSING UP A PREMIUM FLOOR COVERING STAGING THIS SHOT.
 
6. THIS PHOTO, WHICH IS THE ONLY PHOTO IN ITS HIGHEST RESOLUTION, IS STILL SUPER LOW RESOLUTION, WHICH WILL PREVENT PEOPLE FROM PICKING IT APART. It was not bad enough for them to release a screen capture, but even for a screen capture this is garbage. It looks "clear" until you try to do anything with it, like look for bullet holes in the theater. The resolution of the photo is not adequate to reveal a single one, IF any exist at all.  
 
UPDATE: VIDEO OF BEGINNING OF SHOOTING RELEASED BY MSM AS I REQUESTED
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=52b_1447549990 
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=52b_1447549990&use_old_player=0
 
And a few questions:

1. Why is there no crowd reaction AT ALL?
2. If the drummer got shot and fell down, as some are saying, why was he interviewed later with no gunshot wounds?
3. YEP - HOW DID THE SHOOTERS MISS THE BAND, KILLING ONLY MEMBERS OF THE CREW?

 

ANSWERS:

 

1. There was no crowd reaction because the sound of the gunshots was dubbed in afterward. There were no gunshots at the concert, as proven by no crowd reaction, and NO, A SPEAKER CANNOT OUT PERFORM THE SOUND OF AN AK-47, NO MATTER HOW LOUD ONE IS. THEY JUST DO NOT GO THAT LOUD. So EVERYONE in the audience should have jumped out of their shoes if a real gun got fired. 

Let me explain this -
 
Many people have been out in the back country when people have been doing target practice, and the gunshots can be heard CLEARLY miles away. Ok, if so, when have you heard any event and speakers like that from miles away? I remember the stories of an Ozzie Osbourne concert that could be heard from miles away, but it took place in an open air stadium with 50,000 people and laws were written afterward saying a concert cannot be that loud, because many people got their hearing permanently damaged from that one event that was legendary loud. This band was not in a large stadium and was not playing to 50,000 people.  The gunshots should have been deafening and scared the crap out of everyone.

2. The drummer, who was on TV later with no injuries whatsoever, "fell down" - most likely because it was just part of the normal stage act. His sticks did not go flying and instead got placed in the front of the drum set where they belonged. If there was really something going on, the drum sticks would have flown. The guitarist that exited to the left of the screen did so in a way that would be part of a normal act.  Performers do not stand still because that gets boring.  They have to do a show. 

My conclusion: They needed to produce a fake video of this concert getting shot up "WHEN THE SHOOTING HAPPENED" because people were asking for it. So they went over whatever video of the concert there was, waited for a part of the show where they could say, 'yeah, this part of the show looks like people might believe something happened,' and then they dubbed the gunshot audio in. But all aspects were not there.  The lack of crowd reaction in any form at all proves this is not video of a real shooting.

3. The shooters missed the band, and only killed members of the crew BECAUSE THE BAND HAS TO DO MORE SHOWS IN THE FUTURE, AND NO FANS ANYWHERE KNOW ANYONE WHO IS PART OF THE CREW.  Those people can be vanished and no one will be the wiser. If a band member was actually shot, the show could not go on. Therefore, that was not part of the script.

There is a chance the band was totally in on this from the beginning and acted on cue as well, and that all parts of the sound track, other than the gunshots, were real. But one thing is certain.  There were no gunshots AT ALL.  The lack of crowd reaction proves it.

The video blows the lid off EVERYTHING because IT  PROVES PEOPLE HAD THEIR CAMERAS OUT RECORDING THIS LIVE. THERE WAS NOT ONLY ONE PERSON SHOOTING VIDEO.  AS I SAID, THERE SHOULD BE OVER 50 UNIQUE VIDEOS AVAILABLE AT A MINIMUM, AND REALISTICALLY THERE COULD BE OVER 100 WITH AT LEAST 10 RIGHT BY THE SHOOTERS.  NO ONE WILL TURN THEIR VIDEO CAMERA OFF, WHICH TAKES A CONSCIOUS EFFORT, IF THEY ARE BEING SHOT AT. THERE SHOULD BE FULL LENGTH VIDEOS FROM DROPPED CELL PHONES THAT HAVE NOTHING BUT GUYS TALKING ARABIC AND SHOOTING FOR 15 MINUTES STRAIGHT, AND OTHER CELL VIDEOS WHERE THE PHONES DID NOT GET DROPPED BUT AT LEAST GOT PUT IN POCKETS, AND SOME WHERE PEOPLE KEPT THEIR COOL AND FILMED IT ALL. WHERE ARE THEY?

SORRY.  A 20 SECOND CLIP WITH A NOT SHOT DRUMMER DOING AN ACT AND NO CROWD REACTION JUST DOES NOT CUT IT.  IF THE DRUMMER COULD HEAR IT AND HIT THE FLOOR WHILE HE WAS BASHING DRUMS, THE CROWD, WHICH WAS NOT RIGHT BY DRUMS GETTING BASHED, WOULD HAVE HEARD IT.  THIS VIDEO IS BUSTED AND THE FACT IT WAS FRONTED BY THE MSM AS REAL PROVES THIS SHOOTING NEVER HAPPENED AND PROVED THAT POINT IN ONE TAKE.

NOW AN AMATEUR VIDEO OF THE STADIUM BLAST IS OUT THERE.  CAVEAT: IT WAS TAKEN INSIDE THE STADIUM WHILE THE "BLAST" HAPPENED OUTSIDE THE STADIUM. ANOTHER FAKE!

Ok, I can't resist, so I will put this in fine print. DO NOT SKIP THE NEXT "FAR MORE IMPORTANT" REPORT. But I just gotta say this: Try to follow my logic, please . . . . . 

Ok, so Russia kicks ISIS butt in Syria and ISIS, in response, attacks France. Now, even if one makes the point that Muslims are not very bright - trust me - they are not that stupid. Why would ISIS attack France when their worry is Russia? URF. That was a half burp - half vomit . . . . contained. Anyway, I just do not see the logic here. And lots of people do not see the logic. Where is the logic? 

WHERE ARE THE CELL PHONE VIDEOS? Ok, I did not look for photos, but the description was that it was all "apocalyptic," so we ought to be able to see an apocalypse from people's cell phones. Come on now!  We can't trust the media after all those fake ISIS beheadings. I want to see cell phone video from a $29 very kool cell phone, or some other sub $50 piece of pre-paid crap. 

Thousands of people saw this, and I know not everyone has an I-phone. Let's see it if this was real. Let's see the blurry shaky cell phone video. And, even then, if it shows up, I will only believe something happened and that is the end of it. 

Anyway, whatever this was I am sure it was fun for someone and seriously doubt that "someone" has any sort of dent or mark on the forehead.

UPDATE: There were over 1000 people at that concert, all of them with cell phones. At least 50 would have been shooting video when the attacks happened.

I AM LOOKING FORWARD TO PROVING THIS HAPPENED WITH ALL OF THAT FOOTAGE.

http://300spartans.com.au/news/guest/850152-busted-totally-proven-beyond-all-doubt-the-french-government-staged-the-attacks
 
 

2 comments:

siriusvoid said...

I could swear I saw on the news that she was with a group of students at a restaurant... They said of the group of students gathered together talking when the place was attacked. One of six separate places where the attacks happened. I think they said she was the only casualty of the group of design students..

Anonymous said...

Thruth. Saw it also. With a Dutch guy. She was killed at a restaurant. AD from Monday.